Conditions of justice and injury in the narrator.

Abstract

Al-Muhadditheeen (Scholarly narrators) have terms, words and constraints that rank any of them in an equal status as that of the narrative itself and show his position among the best. In addition, since this science is based on evaluating those whose narrations are accepted and those whose narrations are rejected. This science also had constraints and regulations in accepting the narration, and that these narrators are not on the same rank of perfection, nor are they on the same level in integrity, rather they tremendously vary. so, some of them master and control over the narration, and some of them are less than that, and among them are the average, and among them are the weak and propped, and among them are the immoral liar and Others... That is why al-Muhadditheen (the scholarly narrators) constituted matters according to which the narration can be rejected; matters that fail integrity, conditions that must be met, and constraints that must be present. Hence, a narrator is accepted only when recommended by al-Hadeeth Scholars. He is also appealed on by matters that are extremely accurate set only by those scholars, absence of investigation, lack of constrain and verification. Each utterance has a meaning and a rank that shows the state of the narrator, whether it was a doubt or a modification... And they made these words rules for judging in case of discrepancy. Thus, it is a sound approach, a shining beacon, and a track for the modernists to race in explaining the conditions of the narrators, and correcting the narrators. In this way, the hadiths were collected, and the state of the truthful from the liar, the perfect from the weak, the vigilant from the ignorant, the integral and the void